-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 870
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge release/2024.06.02
into master
#8462
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Roman Tsisyk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexander Borsuk <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Matheus Gomes <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Bart Louwers <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexander Borsuk <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Roman Tsisyk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Viktor Govako <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Viktor Govako <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Viktor Govako <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Viktor Govako <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: rtsisyk <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Pastbin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Pastbin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ferenc G茅czi <[email protected]>
don't rebase please. |
Is it possible to rebase commits for master merging, but leave the branch for hotfix to publish today? Merges are disabled for the repo. |
A possible workaround is to make another temp branch (identical to |
What is the problem with merges? |
We want to keep as flat history as possible, for easier rebases and reverts. Disabling merges guarantees that. Enabling merges does not guarantee that, some PRs may be merged accidentally instead of rebased. Is there a way to enable merge only for |
I can merge it manually. |
No description provided.