-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add DomainName field to AdminNetworkPolicyEgressPeer #233
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: rahulkjoshi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Hi @rahulkjoshi. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-network-policy-api ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
@@ -196,6 +196,21 @@ type AdminNetworkPolicyEgressPeer struct { | |||
// +kubebuilder:validation:MinItems=1 | |||
// +kubebuilder:validation:MaxItems=25 | |||
Networks []CIDR `json:"networks,omitempty"` | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we'll have to unfortunately :/ @tssurya can chime in if there's another way since she implemented it in the first place
I dont think it's too big of a deal though, we would just move the EgressPeer
typedef out of shared_types.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rahulkjoshi You should be good to go ahead and make this change :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small PR, I like it!! Almost there :)
// "wikipedia.org" do not. | ||
// | ||
// +kubebuilder:validation:Pattern=`^(\*\.)?([a-zA-z0-9]([-a-zA-Z0-9_]*[a-zA-Z0-9])?\.)+[a-zA-z0-9]([-a-zA-Z0-9_]*[a-zA-Z0-9])?\.?$` | ||
type DomainName string |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Newline
// <network-policy-api:experimental> | ||
// +optional | ||
// +listType=set | ||
// +kubebuilder:validation:MinItems=1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need a max items here?
@@ -196,6 +196,21 @@ type AdminNetworkPolicyEgressPeer struct { | |||
// +kubebuilder:validation:MinItems=1 | |||
// +kubebuilder:validation:MaxItems=25 | |||
Networks []CIDR `json:"networks,omitempty"` | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we'll have to unfortunately :/ @tssurya can chime in if there's another way since she implemented it in the first place
I dont think it's too big of a deal though, we would just move the EgressPeer
typedef out of shared_types.go
#133