test: improve GatewayWithAttachedRoutes conformance test #3169
+61
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
k8s-ci-robot
added
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mlavacca The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
approved
Signed-off-by: Mattia Lavacca <[email protected]>
mlavacca
force-pushed
the
improve-GatewayWithAttachedRoutes-test
branch
from
b470a94
to
5579e38
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind test
/area conformance
What this PR does / why we need it:
The GatewayWithAttachedRoutes conformance test has been improved such that when a route references a non-existing listener in a Gateway through the
SectionName, the number ofAttachedRoutesdoes not get incremented.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: