Enable lint revive Rule: unchecked-type-assertion

[hellspawn679]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• Enable more revive linter rules #5506

Description of the changes

• added check for Type assertion

How was this change tested?

• make lint make test

Checklist

• I have read https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING_GUIDELINES.md
• I have signed all commits
• I have added unit tests for the new functionality
• I have run lint and test steps successfully
  • for jaeger: make lint test
  • for jaeger-ui: yarn lint and yarn test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 12.00000% with 22 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 54.13%. Comparing base (f2b46d4) to head (c432df1).

Files	Patch %	Lines
pkg/cache/lru.go	6.66%	13 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
.../jaeger/internal/extension/jaegerstorage/config.go	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
storage/spanstore/downsampling_writer.go	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
pkg/healthcheck/handler.go	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5516       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   96.19%   54.13%   -42.06%     
===========================================
  Files         327      161      -166     
  Lines       16012     8386     -7626     
===========================================
- Hits        15403     4540    -10863     
- Misses        435     3398     +2963     
- Partials      174      448      +274     

Flag	Coverage Δ
badger_v1	8.03% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
badger_v2	1.93% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
cassandra-3.x-v1	16.40% <4.54%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
cassandra-3.x-v2	1.85% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v1	16.40% <4.54%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v2	1.85% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-7-v1	18.85% <4.54%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-8-v1	19.05% <4.54%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-8-v2	19.05% <4.54%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
grpc_v1	9.47% <9.09%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
grpc_v2	7.53% <8.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
kafka	9.76% <0.00%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
opensearch-1-v1	18.89% <4.54%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
opensearch-2-v1	18.89% <4.54%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
opensearch-2-v2	18.89% <4.54%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
unittests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[varshith257]

@hellspawn679 You can also use ignore at some places where we can't really needed type assertion

[yurishkuro]

Most of these changes are making the code less safe. I would rather disable this linter in those examples. And we don't change auto-generated files.