style(pkg/chartutil): add missing dots and indentation to defaultValues #13111
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Pure cosmetics, add missing dots to a few comments and make indentation coherent between different parts of the defaultValues YAML. Signed-off-by: Leo R. Lundgren <[email protected]>
pull-request-size
bot
added
the
size/S
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pure cosmetics, add missing dots to a few comments and make indentation coherent between different parts of the defaultValues YAML.
What this PR does / why we need it:
It makes the generated
values.yamlfile fromhelm createmore correct/clean.Special notes for your reviewer:
If applicable:
The contribution guidelines say that one should create a new issue if there isn't one for the change one is creating a PR for. I figured that is not worth anyone's time for small changes like this, but let me know if I should still open an issue even fore style changes like this one! I also wasn't sure if the branch name should still be prefixed with
feat/in its name, it's not clear from the contribution/developer docs.