Replies: 1 comment
-
Interesting idea. In my experience, chat AIs like ChatGPT aren't very good at Prolog in general. If an AI was trained to do this specifically, then maybe they would actually be good enough, but training an AI like this is really hard. I also think that Scryer's errors would need to improve drastically with more information before this could be remotely viable, but maybe an sufficiently advanced AI could infer most of it. My intuition is that a "dumb" (in the sense of no trained statistical AI) system like GUPU would be more impactful for less work. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
An idea occurred to me today. Would it be possible or even a good idea to augment the Scryer Prolog playground with a chatbot AI that could coach beginners through their syntax errors? The effort involved to train an AI up to a good level of quality might preclude realistically doing this.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions