Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Semantic Segmentation] - Problem when re-training Semantic segmentation, Accuracy decrease with parameter default? #282

Open
vanloctc opened this issue Jun 7, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@vanloctc
Copy link

vanloctc commented Jun 7, 2021

Hi @charlesq34,

I'm really grateful when you public this source for me to have a chance to learn.
I'm trying to re-training PointNet Semantic Segmentation but seems to be the training process met overfitting/underfitting with the 10th epoch. I still try for researching the cause but I think you can know the more cleary result.
This is a summary result:

(log_train.txt) - almost file

EPOCH 009
mean loss: 271829.089959
accuracy: 0.549186

eval mean loss: 167083.881273
eval accuracy: 0.421601
eval avg class acc: 0.260372
**** EPOCH 010 ****

mean loss: 129570.972106
accuracy: 0.561843

eval mean loss: 103253.728045
eval accuracy: 0.484906
eval avg class acc: 0.297415
Model saved in file: log6/model.ckpt
**** EPOCH 011 ****

mean loss: 37190426.054835
accuracy: 0.354552

eval mean loss: 6327.641183
eval accuracy: 0.462198
eval avg class acc: 0.178751
**** EPOCH 012 ****

mean loss: 5618.020521
accuracy: 0.337940

eval mean loss: 4386.426989
eval accuracy: 0.203347
eval avg class acc: 0.133981

@vanloctc
Copy link
Author

vanloctc commented Jun 7, 2021

Loss_Accuary
This image above is the plot of loss and accuracy of log_train.txt

@Swaraj-72
Copy link

Hello @vanloctc, have you found any feasible solution for your case? I have been facing similar issue with my custom dataset.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants