You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The report_matplotlib_figure method currently sets the iteration value to 0 when the iteration parameter is None. This results in an unnecessary display of "iteration 0". I propose that the method be modified so that if iteration is None, the iteration value should not be displayed.
Motivation
In many cases, users may not want to specify an iteration value when reporting a matplotlib figure. Setting the default iteration value to 0 can be misleading and clutter the report with unnecessary information. By omitting the iteration value when iteration=None, the reported plots will be cleaner and more accurate, reflecting the user's intention not to specify an iteration.
Related Discussion
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Without going into ClearML internals, do you mean that when a single plot is reported, with no iteration value, no iteration value should appear in the title?
I saw your answer too late. I'm sorry.
Yes, that’s right.
In the case of a plot that has no correlation with iteration, iteration information is not required,
so the default value of 0 is output even though it is entered as None.
Proposal Summary
The report_matplotlib_figure method currently sets the iteration value to 0 when the iteration parameter is None. This results in an unnecessary display of "iteration 0". I propose that the method be modified so that if iteration is None, the iteration value should not be displayed.
Motivation
In many cases, users may not want to specify an iteration value when reporting a matplotlib figure. Setting the default iteration value to 0 can be misleading and clutter the report with unnecessary information. By omitting the iteration value when iteration=None, the reported plots will be cleaner and more accurate, reflecting the user's intention not to specify an iteration.
Related Discussion
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: