You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To explain the " black-box " NN is always interesting . However , it is hard to say if the " black-box " NN is well-trained (before explaining it ) . My question is that can we improve the " black-box " NN after distilling it ? IMO , the goal of RL-based method (no matter " black " or " white " box ) should be outperforming heuristic methods in most of the test cases .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To explain the " black-box " NN is always interesting . However , it is hard to say if the " black-box " NN is well-trained (before explaining it ) . My question is that can we improve the " black-box " NN after distilling it ? IMO , the goal of RL-based method (no matter " black " or " white " box ) should be outperforming heuristic methods in most of the test cases .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: