Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prompt details about evaluating on EditBench #33

Open
CharlesGong12 opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Prompt details about evaluating on EditBench #33

CharlesGong12 opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@CharlesGong12
Copy link

Hi, what an amazing work!
I found that you evaluated BrushNet on editbench in your paper. In the editbench's annotation file, there are several kinds of prompts: prompt_full, prompt_mask-simple, prompt_mask-rich and the like. So which prompt did you use when evaluating?

@CharlesGong12
Copy link
Author

And there seems no refined EditBench in the link you provide. Looking forward to your reply!

@juxuan27
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, @CharlesGong12 ! I use prompt_full for evaluation. The refined EditBench directly uses the mask of EditBench (by extracting the black part). We can not release the refined EditBench due to license issues, but it is really easy to process. Sorry for the trouble!

@CharlesGong12
Copy link
Author

CharlesGong12 commented May 22, 2024

Thanks for your reply! I am confused why not use prompt_mask, the local description for inpainting area? It seems that using local description is much more common in real inpainting scenarios, such as replacing a red shirt with a blue shirt and using prompt "blue shirt". @juxuan27

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants